An experimental study to assess the
effectiveness of structured teaching programme on
knowledge regarding the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M. students
in selected nursing school at Sikar, Rajasthan
Pushpendra Kumar1, Titi
Xavier Mangalathil2, Vikas Choudhary3
1Assistant Professor, Arawali
College of Nursing, Sikar
2Associate Professor, Rajasthan College of
Nursing, Sikar
3Lecturer, M.M College of Nursing, Mullana
*Corresponding Author E-mail: vikasss.1988@gmail.com
Objectives:
1. To assess the pretest
knowledge regarding the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M. students
of control and experimental group.
2. To assess the post-test
knowledge regarding the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M. students
of control and experimental group.
3. To compare the pretest and
posttest knowledge regarding the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M.
students of control and experimental group.
4. To ascertain the relationship
of structured teaching on knowledge regarding the management of diabetes
mellitus among G.N.M. students with selected personal variables.
Material and Method: Experimental approach, true
experimental design was used and the study conducted in Rajasthan institute of nursing and Shri
Kalyan Arogaya Sadan, Sikar (Rajasthan).
60students of G.N.M were chosen by Non proportionate stratified random
sampling. The data collected through self-structured questionnaire. The data
was analyzed by descriptive statistics (mean, median and mode) and inferential
statistics (Chi square, F test, Correlation of coefficient and t test).
Results: The pretest mean knowledge score
of experimental group was 19.70 and in post-test 32.62 after carrying out the
structured teaching programme. On other side control
group mean knowledge score of pretest was 19.78 and in post-test 21.38.
Horizontal ‘t’ test findings between pre-test and post-test of experimental
group was 19.061 is highly significant at the level of P<0.001 and vertical ‘t’
test value between post-tests of control and experimental group was 198.538
also highly significant at the level of P<0.001. It has shown that
structured teaching brought valuable change in the knowledge of school children
regarding traffic safety.
Recommendations: The findings of the study shown
that there is need to carry out the interventions to increase the knowledge of
G.N.M students regarding management of diabetes mellitus which further will help to increase the
diabetes patient care.
KEYWORDS: Experimental Study, Structured
Teaching Programme, Diabetes Mellitus, G.N.M students
INTRODUCTION:
“Life is not over because you have diabetes. Make the most of what you
have, be grateful’’
Diabetes mellitus is a multisystem
disease related to abnormal insulin production, impaired insulin utilization,
or both Diabetes mellitus is a serious health problem throughout the world.
Around 150 Million
peoples suffered from diabetes in the World, out of that above 35 million are
Indians, the highest in the world, so it is called Diabetic capital of world.1
Every fifth person who suffer from diabetes in the world today is an Indian.2
By 2030 Indian will have 79.4 Million diabetic projects of WHO (World Health
Organization) that’s more than twice the current number over 35 million cases.
No wonder India is the “Diabetic Capital of the World”.3
The International
Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates the total number of people in India with
diabetes to be around 50.8 million in 2010, rising to 87.0 million by 2030.
Although, the prevalence of diabetes in India is likely to continue to be among
top three countries (China, India and USA) that are estimated to have the
highest number of people with diabetes by the year 2030.4,5
The economic cost
of diabetes continue to increase because of increasing health care cost and an
aging population. Half of all people who
have diabetes and are older than 65 years of age are hospitalized each year and
severe and life threatening complications often contribute to the increased
rate of hospitalization.6
METHODS AND MATERIAL:
Objectives
1. To assess the pretest
knowledge regarding the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M. students
of control and experimental group.
2. To assess the post-test
knowledge regarding the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M. students
of control and experimental group.
3. To compare the pretest and
posttest knowledge regarding the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M.
students of control and experimental group.
4. To ascertain the relationship
of structured teaching on knowledge regarding the management of diabetes
mellitus among G.N.M. students with selected personal variables.
Hypothesis
• H1 The posttest mean knowledge
score regarding the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M students in the
experimental group will be significantly higher than those of the control group
G.N.MM students of the control group as measured by structured questionnaire at
0.05 levels.
H0 There will not be
statistically significant difference in posttest mean knowledge score regarding
the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M students in the in control and
experimental group as measured by structured questionnaire.
Research Approach
An experimental research
approach was adopted to accomplish the objective of the study to assess the
effectiveness of structured teaching programme regarding
the management of diabetes mellitus among G.N.M students in Rajasthan institute
of nursing and Shri Kalyan Arogaya Sadan, Sikar (Rajasthan)
Research Design
An experimental design was
prepared to develop a plan of strategy that would guide the collection and analysis
of data.
Experimental group: 01- X- 02,
Control group 01- 02
·
O1 –Pretest
·
X – Manipulation
·
O2 – Posttest
Sample and Sampling Technique
Two nursing schools were confirmed to conduct study. These schools
were divided into control and experimental group with help of lottery method.
The total 60G.N.M students were selected from both groups by using stratified
random sampling technique.
Description of tool
The tool consisted of two parts
Part1: Sample characteristics
This part consisted of 5 items for obtaining personal information:
Part2: Questionnaire
This part consists of multiple choice questions on all aspects of
G.N.M students regarding management of diabetes mellitus. This questionnaire
consisted of 40 multiple choice items, each item consist of one correct answer
among the four choices and each correct answer carry one mark.
Plan of Analysis
Analysis and interpretation of data was done by using descriptive
and inferential statistics such as Percentage, Mean, Mean Percentage, Standard
Deviation, and Coefficient of Correlation, Chi Square Test, T Test and ANOVA.
RESULTS:
The data presented in table
1shows computed paired 't' test values
between the pre-test and post-test is higher than the table value (t=1.66,p<0.05). The data is
statistically significant in all the areas. Hence it is inferred that the STP
was effective in increasing the knowledge of subjects regarding management of
diabetes mellitus.
Table No. 1: Comparison for
effectiveness of teaching by calculating Pretest and Posttest mean, SD,
horizontal and vertical ‘t’ test of Knowledge Scores among G.N.M Students
Regarding management of diabetes. N=60
|
Group |
Knowledge Score |
|
|||||
|
|
Pre-test |
Post-test |
|||||
|
N |
MEAN |
SD |
MEAN |
SD |
DF |
T |
|
|
Control group |
30 |
19.78 |
3.612 |
21.38 |
4.013 |
29 |
2.463NS |
|
Experimental group |
30 |
19.70 |
3.564 |
32.62 |
3.328 |
29 |
19.061** |
|
|
Df |
T |
|
Df |
t |
|
|
|
|
58 |
2.324NS |
58 |
198.538** |
|
||
Maximum Score=60, **=
significant at P<0.001, Minimum Score=0, NS= Non Significant
Table2 Association between selected variables and pre-test
knowledge score among G.N.M students regarding management of diabetes mellitus N=60
|
Characteristics |
Control group (N=30) |
Experimental group(N=30) |
|
|
||
|
|
F |
% |
F |
% |
df |
X2 |
|
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
18-21 |
23 |
76 |
24 |
80 |
1 |
0.172* |
|
·
More than 21 |
7 |
23 |
6 |
20 |
|
|
|
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Male |
6 |
20 |
7 |
23 |
1 |
0.163* |
|
·
Female |
24 |
80 |
23 |
76 |
|
|
|
Residence of students |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Rural |
18 |
60 |
19 |
63 |
1 |
0.186* |
|
·
Urban |
12 |
40 |
11 |
37 |
|
|
|
Religion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Hindu |
28 |
94 |
26 |
87 |
1 |
0.179* |
|
·
Muslim |
01 |
03 |
03 |
10 |
|
|
|
·
Others |
01 |
03 |
01 |
03 |
|
|
|
Past experience of giving care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Care given one time |
11 |
37 |
12 |
40 |
2 |
1.321* |
|
·
Care given 2-5 times |
10 |
33 |
09 |
30 |
|
|
|
·
Care given more than 5 times |
03 |
10 |
04 |
13 |
|
|
|
·
Not given |
06 |
20 |
05 |
17 |
|
|
*= Not significant
The table 2 shows that
Chi-square test value computed between pre-test knowledge score and demographic
variables was not significant at 0.05 levels. Therefore there is no association
between knowledge score of subjects and above listed selected demographic
variables. Hence null hypothesis is accepted and research hypothesis is
rejected. Thus it is inferred that gain in knowledge score was due to the
administration of STP.
DISCUSSION:
Findings shows that structured
teaching programme had excellent level of improvement
in experimental group of G.N.M students as in control group it was average or
below average. There is no relation between structured teaching programme and personal variables.
REFERENCES:
1. Ebersole. Toward Healthy aging. Human
needs and Nursing response. 5th ed. New York: Mosby; 1998
2. Aruna Dubey, Seema Bhasin,
Neelima Gupta and Neeraj
Sharma. A Study of Elderly Living in Old Age Home and Within Family. University of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir,
India; 2011.
3.
RGUHS Journal of Medical Sciences, April 2012, Vol 2, Issue 2. P 102 - 104.
4.
MayagahKanj and Wayne Mitic. Discussion at the 7th Global Conference on Health
Promotion, World Health Organization. October 2009.
5. K Park, “Textbook of Community
Health Nursing”, 4th edition, Published by M/S Banarsidas
Bhanot. P 340-344
6.
Neelammakol, Manisha Diabetes an emerging health problems in India.
Health action. 2008. Now 4; 6 (10): 4, 5,14, 16.
Received on 31.03.2014 Modified on 30.04.2014
Accepted on 10.05.2014 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Asian J. Management 5(3):
July-September, 2014 page 329-331